UNC Coastal Library Consortium
Coastal Consortium Advisory Committee Meeting
UNC-Wilmington
November 17, 1999
Minutes
Members present:
Lillian Brewington, Robert Canida, Eloise Cave, Teresa McManus, Sue
Cody, Arlene Hanerfeld, and Daniel Pfohl.
1.
Minutes - Posting/ Corrections
The Chair of the Coastal Consortium Advisory Committee asked that the
minutes be posted right after the meeting because as chair she would probably
have to send something to the directors about the Internet Cataloging, but
because she did not have the minutes, she could not send anything to the
directors. The only thing she
could send was the memo about the purchasing of the Review Files, and she
never did get permission from Pembroke to purchase the Review Files.
Also, the minutes need to be done soon after the meeting because other
members need to have a chance to read them.
Robert Canida asked that we use Robert instead of
Bob when writing the minutes.
2.
Coastal Library Consortium Patron Records
Robert Canida mentioned that in August he had sent Ron Johnson a memo
asking for clarification on the Intra Consortium Borrowing Policy.
He wanted to know for example, if UNC-P had to create another record,
if the item was borrowed from FSU. Daniel
Pfohl said that we used to create a new record, but now we have to do this.
Robert wanted to know what to do if a book became excessively overdue
for a month or so. Daniel said
that we would do like we did with ILL’s, the institution would invoice them.
Arlene stated that there would have to be
human intervention. Robert
also wanted to know who would collect fines that might occur between the
institutions. Arlene mentioned that if one of our patrons had Pembroke’s
books, and if they became overdue, then the university would pay the debt.
Therefore, if you have a patron that is delinquent , you would need to
let the University know. Daniel
ask when will we have time to do that because each institution has different
loan rules. Arlene suggested that we reexamine this issue and let whoever
owned that patron know what the situation was. Robert said that the Consortia agreed not to charge
fines.
3.
Clarification of Policy/Procedures/Current Practice for Adding Internet
Sites to the Catalog
Standards for cataloging Internet items and maintaining the 856 fields were passed out by Daniel Pfohl. Arlene stated that she did not report anything to the Directors yet, because she was not sure of what she would report. She felt like the Directors wanted us to go ahead and start this, but not using PURL’s. Arlene mentioned that Fayetteville had started doing this, but UNC-W was at a standstill because of the vacant position in Cataloging. She mentioned that records had been input before the “ci” location was scoped, but after the scoping was completed they made each record file by doing a rapid update on the records and they are now properly scoped.
Next, Arlene
discussed using LinkBot to maintain 856 fields. The institution inputting the 856 will put their initial in
Bcode 3, each institution would be responsible for maintaining links on their
records based on the code in Bcode3.
She made a list of all of records
with 856 fields and sorted them by the 049 fields, assuming that whoever
downloaded the record probably
added the 856 field. There were
70 at FSU and 40 at UNC-P. She
stated that she put P, F, and W in all of those records so you can put your
institution’s records in a review file before running LinkBot.
Arlene said that there were a few at Fayetteville that did not have the
Bcode 3. Teresa McManus ask if
Arlene had a recent one that had been done.
Arlene said that for bib locations each school should put in a F, P,
and W. Daniel explained the
guidelines to Teresa because she had a question about Bcode3.
Teresa, also had
questions about Material Types - should they be in the guidelines?
Arlene said that they would report back by email about that.
Teresa asked about maintenance of URL’s.
Daniel stated that the Advisory Committee recommended that each school
be responsible for maintaining the links on records that they add into the
database. He mentioned that
Wilmington could provide a list to each school.
Daniel also mentioned that the Link Preparation Program is a free
program from Tom Tyler and you would need to use it in order to use the
LinkBot Program.
Teresa had
several other questions such as (1) Will this provide the correct address link
or URL - no, it will give you broken links; (2) Are there other tools that you
would recommend that we look at? Yes, LinkBot; (3) If UNC-W or UNC-P had
inadequate information could we make corrections, for example 856 or a call
number, and do we sent it to the school or do it ourselves? Email it to the
schools.
4.
UNC-W Electronic/Full-Text Journal Project
Arlene stated that Wilmington had been putting the 856's in journals
that had web sites for about 4 years. Arlene
said that she had been charged with providing access with what they get
full-text through their various databases. She mentioned that EBSCO would provide MARC records for
the EBSCO Host full-text titles, and Wilmington FTP’ed the Academic Search
records at the beginning of September. They
decided to use a check in record and the identify field to show holdings.
She passed out a sample record. Arlene
mentioned that they had already FTP’ed brief MARC records from Bryn Mawr for
Lexis Nexis full-text titles, and EBSCO does not yet have the records
available for their other EBSCO Host databases, but they will be available
soon.
Arlene said that she did not consider this the same as the Internet Cataloging Resources Project so the are not putting in Bcodes, unless they have a 856 link to the record. They were not doing call #’s because they are journals and they do not do call #’s for journals. They have purchased Dow Jones Interactive and will be doing the same thing for that and ProQuest. At some point they plan to go in and add subject access. Arlene mentioned that one reason that Wilmington did the check in records was to provide Sherman a list by academic department so that he can be able to go to the Nursing Department and say, “here is what you have access to.” They are using Scode4 to assign an academic department to all of these full-text titles. Teresa wanted to know why Wilmington was using check in records. Arlene said so that people can search the catalog and see if they have access to this journal, and how many ways they have access to it, and what dates are available in different databases. Arlene said that 1400 academic search titles were done.
Arlene also
discussed the concerns that Teresa had about the Experimental Aging Research
record. Arlene said that she and
Jean and Dan had decided to edit the first field 856 (View full-text), instead
of having two records. She said
that it is an individual decision of what project each school was willing to
work on. Teresa asked that
Fayetteville have a location code for their electronic serials.
Dan suggested that Fayetteville might want to use an old code that is no
longer in use such as the CD LANs. He
said that he would email her back on this.
5.
Implementation of Featured Lists.
Arlene said that she would look at using featured lists more, now that
we have purchased additional review files.
The reason that she put this on the agenda is that some schools are
putting an asterisk at the beginning of these, indicating that these files are
Featured Lists and shouldn’t be deleted.
If this becomes a problem we might consider doing that.
Robert wanted to
discuss NCLIVE passwords. What
are UNC-W and Fayetteville doing with the password. UNC-W said that visiting scholars have it.
Don’t want to be bothered with setting up another password.
FSU staff are not doing
anything with it because of FTP, community use it, etc...
Daniel mentioned
that Millennium Serials is slated to be loaded in January.
6.
Other Matters of Business
Minutes submitted by Eloise Cave, updated on May 31, 1999.